Apple vs. EU: The DMA Showdown Intensifies
Inside the high-stakes legal clash testing Apple’s control, EU regulation, and the future of digital market competition
The legal battle between Apple and the European Union has reached a new level of intensity. In a recent court hearing, the tech giant’s lawyers described the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) as imposing “hugely onerous and intrusive burdens.” In response, the EU’s counsel accused Apple of seeking “absolute control” over its ecosystem to lock in users and generate “supernormal profits.” This sharp exchange in the EU General Court highlights the deep philosophical and financial divide between one of the world’s most powerful companies and one of its most influential regulators. At stake is the very structure of Apple’s “walled garden” and the future of digital competition in Europe.
Try it free for 7 days and see why thousands of readers can’t get enough of us.
What’s New in the Apple vs. EU Dispute?
Heated Courtroom Rhetoric: Apple’s legal team criticized the DMA’s rules as intrusive, while the EU accused Apple of using its “walled garden” to achieve excessive profits.
Ongoing Legal Challenge: Despite reports of a potential settlement, Apple is actively pursuing its case in the EU General Court to have the DMA modified or repealed.
Core Conflict: The dispute centers on whether the DMA’s requirements for competition compromise Apple’s commitment to user privacy and security.
Understanding the Digital Markets Act
The Digital Markets Act is a landmark piece of EU legislation designed to ensure fair and open digital markets. It targets “gatekeepers”—large online platforms with a significant impact on the European market, a durable market position, and a role as an essential gateway for business users to reach their customers.
In 2023, the European Commission designated Apple as a gatekeeper, specifically focusing on its iOS operating system, the Safari browser, and the App Store. This designation came with a set of strict obligations aimed at preventing the company from leveraging its dominance to stifle competition.
Key DMA Requirements for Apple
The DMA’s rules forced Apple to make fundamental changes to its historically closed ecosystem. Two primary areas of focus were app distribution and hardware interoperability.
First, the EU mandated that Apple allow alternative methods for distributing iPhone apps, breaking the App Store’s long-held monopoly. In response, Apple enabled the creation of third-party app marketplaces in the EU. This allows developers to offer their apps to users outside of Apple’s direct control and fee structure, though Apple has implemented its own set of rules and fees for this new system.
Second, the DMA requires that gatekeepers provide interoperability for hardware accessories. If Apple introduces a new feature that connects an iPhone with its own products, like AirPods, it must make the underlying technology available to third-party hardware manufacturers. This aims to create a level playing field, so that companies creating headphones or other accessories can offer the same seamless integration that Apple’s own products enjoy.
Apple’s Position: Privacy, Security, and Burdens
From the outset, Apple has argued that the DMA’s mandates threaten its core product principles. The company’s defense rests on three main pillars: security, privacy, and the sheer operational burden of compliance.
Apple’s lawyers contend that the “walled garden” of iOS and the App Store is not a tool for locking in users but a critical security feature. By vetting every app and update, Apple protects users from malware, scams, and privacy violations. Allowing third-party app stores, or “sideloading,” inherently introduces risks that the company can no longer control.
Similarly, on hardware interoperability, Apple has raised privacy concerns. It argues that opening up APIs and system-level access to third-party developers could create vulnerabilities that bad actors might exploit. The company has publicly stated that these challenges are the reason some new features have been delayed for users within the EU, as it re-engineers them to comply with the DMA without compromising user data.
During the latest court hearing, Apple’s counsel emphasized that the obligations are not just philosophically opposed but practically burdensome, imposing “hugely onerous and intrusive” requirements that conflict with the company’s rights.
The EU’s Rebuttal: Breaking Down the Walls
The European Commission sees the situation differently. From its perspective, Apple’s “walled garden” is less about protection and more about profit. The EU’s lawyer argued that Apple’s “absolute control” allows it to lock users into its ecosystem, making it difficult for them to switch and enabling the company to charge developers high commissions.
The Commission’s legal team described this control as the key to Apple’s “supernormal profits.” It believes that by being the sole gatekeeper to more than a third of European smartphone users, Apple dictates the terms of business, stifles innovation from smaller competitors, and ultimately harms consumer choice. The EU’s position is that the DMA is a necessary corrective measure to reintroduce fairness and competition into the digital marketplace.
Potential Scenarios and Future Timelines
The ongoing legal battle exists alongside reports that Apple is close to settling with the EU over specific DMA violations. This dual track—litigating the law’s validity while negotiating compliance—suggests a complex strategy. Three primary scenarios could unfold from here.
Settlement with Remedies: Apple could agree to a settlement with the European Commission, which would likely involve further changes to its App Store policies, fee structures, and interoperability frameworks. This would resolve the immediate threat of fines but leave the core DMA legislation in place.
Partial Compliance and Continued Litigation: Apple may choose to comply just enough to avoid the most severe penalties while continuing its legal fight in the EU General Court. If it loses there, it could appeal to the EU’s highest court, the Court of Justice. This path could extend the legal battle for several more years.
A Surprise Legal Victory: While seen as unlikely, Apple could succeed in its bid to have parts of the DMA modified or even annulled. Such an outcome would be a major blow to the EU’s regulatory agenda and could reshape digital policy across the bloc.
The timeline for a final resolution is long. A judgment from the General Court could take a year or more, and a subsequent appeal could add another one to two years to the process.
Broader Implications for the Tech World
The outcome of this dispute will have ripple effects far beyond Apple and the EU.
For Developers: A fully enforced DMA could lower the barrier to entry, reduce commission fees, and provide more ways to reach customers. However, it could also fragment the market, forcing developers to manage multiple app stores and compliance standards.
For Consumers: Proponents of the DMA argue it will lead to more choice, lower prices, and greater innovation. Critics, including Apple, warn of a degraded user experience fraught with new security and privacy risks.
For Apple: The biggest risk is to its high-margin services business, which is heavily reliant on App Store revenue. Complying with the DMA forces a fundamental shift in a business model that has been wildly successful for over a decade.
What to Watch Next
As this high-stakes confrontation unfolds, several key signals will indicate its direction. Pay close attention to any formal announcements of a settlement between Apple and the Commission, as this would signal a move toward de-escalation. The tone and questions from the judges in the General Court may offer clues about their leanings. Finally, watch how other designated gatekeepers, like Google and Meta, navigate their own DMA compliance battles, as their strategies could influence Apple’s and the EU’s next moves.
This is more than a corporate dispute; it is a defining moment in the relationship between big tech and government regulation. The world is watching to see whether the walls of the garden will stand or fall.
Enjoyed this post? Share your thoughts in the comments!
Like, Restack, and Share to spread Apple Secrets!