Why Cars Are Ditching Android Auto
Inside the Drive Toward Proprietary Systems, Data Control, and the Changing In-Car Digital Experience
For over a decade, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay have served as the crucial bridge between our smartphones and vehicles, providing a familiar, user-friendly interface for navigation, music, and messaging. They solved many of the clunky software issues inherent to automaker-built infotainment systems. Yet, this era of seamless phone integration is undergoing a pivotal shift.
Major manufacturers—such as General Motors—are beginning to phase out these popular platforms, especially in their electric vehicle offerings. This move is far more than a minor software update; it marks a strategic shift in how automakers envision the digital experience behind the wheel. Underpinning this change are goals of greater data control, expanded revenue streams, and deeper system integration—a future in which the car, rather than your phone, is the heart of your digital life on the road.
The End of an Era: Why Automakers Are Disconnecting
At first glance, moving away from widely-used platforms like Android Auto and CarPlay seems counterintuitive, especially since they directly address users’ real-world needs. However, automakers are thinking long-term. Their strategies are driven by a desire for control, recurring revenue, and a refined brand experience.
1. The Battle for Data Control
The most powerful motivator behind this transition is data ownership. With Android Auto and CarPlay, the bulk of user data—from app usage and navigation history to music preferences—flows directly to Google and Apple. Automakers are left with little access, acting as mere “dumb screens” for the phone’s content.
In a marketplace where data rivals oil in value, car manufacturers see an opportunity to collect and analyze firsthand information on how drivers interact with their vehicles. By developing their own native infotainment systems, automakers can:
Gather detailed insights into driving habits
Track usage of in-car features and services
Monitor media consumption patterns
Capture real-time vehicle performance and diagnostic data
This data is vital—not just for developing new features and refining vehicle design, but for creating innovative business models. It provides direct customer insights, eliminating the intermediary role that Google and Apple currently play.
2. The Rise of the Subscription Model
By controlling the software ecosystem, automakers can tap into new and recurring revenue streams. The days when selling a vehicle marked the end of the customer relationship are fading. Inspired by the tech world’s success, car brands are increasingly adopting subscription-based services.
By replacing Android Auto with proprietary systems, manufacturers are positioned to offer—and charge for—a range of premium services:
Premium Navigation: Enhanced traffic data, intelligent routing, and integrated charging station locators for EVs
Enhanced Entertainment: Access to exclusive streaming, in-car gaming, and premium audio
Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS): Subscription-based access to features like hands-free driving or automated parking
Third-Party Apps: Proprietary app stores, potentially earning a share of revenue much like Apple and Google
GM’s move to introduce its “Ultifi” software platform, powered by Android Automotive (distinct from Android Auto), exemplifies this trend. Ultifi promises native integration of Google Maps and Assistant while remaining a GM-controlled experience—laying the groundwork for more subscription offerings.
3. Deeper System Integration and Brand Identity
Automakers maintain that proprietary systems offer a more cohesive, deeply integrated user experience. While CarPlay and Android Auto excel in media and navigation, they are limited in access to the core workings of the vehicle.
A manufacturer-developed infotainment system can intertwine with key car functions:
Climate Control: Adjust settings from the main display with ease
Driving Modes: Sync entertainment and visual themes with different modes (Sport, Comfort, Eco)
EV-Specific Features: Deliver precise range estimates based on route, driving style, and weather—levels of integration phone-mirroring cannot match
Beyond functionality, this shift allows brands to craft unique, consistent user experiences. Rather than displaying generic iOS or Android interfaces, they can design visuals, sounds, and interactions that reinforce their brand identity—an approach embraced by Tesla and Rivian from the outset.
What Does This Mean for You?
The transition away from Android Auto and CarPlay is a double-edged sword for drivers. While automakers highlight improved integration and new features, important trade-offs are on the horizon.
Potential Downsides:
Learning Curve: Each manufacturer’s system is different, eroding the familiar consistency drivers expect from CarPlay or Android Auto
App Availability: Robust app ecosystems from Google and Apple will be replaced—at least initially—by more limited proprietary app stores
Cost: Features currently free with your smartphone may become part of paid subscription tiers
Privacy: Expanded data collection by automakers raises questions about how personal information is used and secured
Promised Upsides:
Tighter Integration: Navigation, vehicle controls, and media will work together more fluidly
Smarter Features: Advanced voice assistants and AI-powered tools tailored for your car, such as GM’s plans to leverage Google AI
Over-the-Air (OTA) Updates: Regular delivery of new features and improvements throughout a vehicle’s lifespan
The Road Ahead
For many automakers, leaving behind phone-mirroring systems is a matter of “when,” not “if.” Brands like Ford plan to offer Android Auto and CarPlay alongside their own platforms, but the industry-wide trend is unmistakable: automakers want control over the dashboard experience.
For drivers, that likely means saying goodbye to the straightforward plug-and-play that’s become second nature. The in-car experience is becoming more advanced and cohesive—yet also more fragmented and potentially more costly. As vehicles increasingly resemble smartphones on wheels, the contest for control of the dashboard has only just begun.
If you enjoy Apple Secrets, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to support our work.
We publish daily Apple news, insights, and stories that matter to our readers.
Like most newsletters, fewer than 5% of our subscribers are paid.
Your support at $5/month or $45/year helps us keep Apple Secrets independent and growing into 2026.
Thank you for being here ❤️
Will not purchase a vehicle that doesn’t allow wireless Apple CarPlay … period!
GM is WRONG, Ford already has me in a F150 after dumping my Tundra and the 2025 Camry will be replaced with a Ford product as well.
Toyota is moving away from supporting CarPlay also so they are off the potential purchase list for me adult family of 6 that has and will purchase MANY new vehicles that continue to provide what we want and not force their terrible versions on us.
This will fail if they do not offer a powerful incentive besides punishment if not switching. They need to find features that are ONLY available because what the car knows and can do. Full autonomous driving maybe is the best hope?
GM and Ford are too big and unorganized to do this. They can’t even update their vehicle architecture without failing and losing money. Ford is canning EV programs.
Now Tesla, who has been a long holdout seems to be adding Apple CarPlay to scoop up some frustrated GM customers. GM will have to follow suit.
Xiaomi went the route of seamless integration not by charging more but by being a tech company that made a car. Apparently that’s easier than a car company making integrated tech.
The big 3 doing this will just give up more market to west coast and china.